-
Mark Newby, et al. v. Enron Corp., et al. and Pamela M. Tittle, et al. v. Enron Corp., et al., Defended a former Vice-Chair of the Board and an executive officer in all of the Enron-related litigation and matters;
-
Securities and Exchange Commission v. J. Kenneth Stringer, III, et al. and United States of America v. J. Kenneth Stringer; III, et al. Defended FLIR's former CEO in an SEC investigation, an enforcement proceeding and in a criminal prosecution. The criminal prosecution was dismissed then reversed on appeal. U.S. v. Stringer, 408 F. Supp.2d 1083 (D. Or. 2006), reversed, 521 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir.), amended, 535 F.3d 929 (9th Cir. 2008). Both the criminal and enforcement proceedings were settled.
-
Wayne C. Van Zwoll v. William Swindells, et al. and Willamette Industries, Inc., et al., and related cases. 219 OR App 16 (2008). Defended the non-Weyerhaeuser appointed board members in an action related to Weyerhaeuser's hostile tender offer for Willamette Industries;
-
In re Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 95-707-JO; In re Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Derivative Litigation, New Castle County, Delaware Chancery Court Consolidated C.A. No. 14322; In re Louisiana-Pacific Inner-Seal™ Siding Products Liability Litigation, U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Case No. 95-879-JO-LEAD. Represented Louisiana-Pacific’s former Chairman and CEO, Harry A. Merlo, in these securities, derivative and products liability class actions;
-
Melridge, Inc. v. Heublein, et al. Case started as an internal investigation by the Board of Directors concerning alleged wrongdoing by insiders. Ended with a Chapter 11 proceeding, injunctive relief and a $150 million judgment against the principal wrongdoer;
-
Medford Corporation v. Simmons, Case No. 84-847 (D. Or. May 9, 1985) Defended Medford Corp. from a hostile tender offer by Harold Simmons and his group;
-
Kahn, et al. v. Robert A. Sprouse, II, et al., 842 F Supp 423 (D. Or. 1993). Successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of directors in the face of allegations of misdeeds by minority shareholders. This is the seminal case in our district upholding the validity of investigations by independent committees of boards of directors;
-
Lewis v. Chiles, et al. 719F2d 1044 (9th Cir 1983). On behalf of Fred G. Meyer's Estate, defeated a challenge to the acquisition of Fred Meyer by KKR;
-
In the Matter of the Estate of Reuben Lenske, Case No. CMCR 0111921007; Moshe Lenske & Judith Temko v. Shirlee Lenske, et al., Case No. 0202-01510; Skyline Investments, Inc. V. Shirlee Lenske, et al., Case No. 0205-04675. Successfully represented two children of Reuben Lenske who brought various claims against his widow and others, including for tortious interference with prospective inheritance. After a seven-week jury trial, the jury awarded our clients 100% of the estate;
-
Columbia Management Co. v. Wyss. 765 P2d 207 (94 Or App 195, 1988). Obtained a multimillion-dollar recovery in this dissenting shareholder case. This is the seminal case in Oregon on dissenter's rights;
-
PGE v. Warm Springs Tribes, USDC. On behalf of Portland General Electric, overturned a $225 million arbitration award regarding PGE's obligations to the Warm Springs Indians;
-
In Re Baldwin United Bankruptcy. Represented the petitioning creditors in what at the time was the largest involuntary bankruptcy ever filed;
-
In Re Rajneesh Neo-Sannyas International Commune. For the primary petitioning creditor in the involuntary bankruptcy of one of the Rajneesh entities, obtained an interim trustee and, through this and other related international actions, obtained almost 100¢ on the dollar repayment for our client who had advanced approximately $2 million;
-
PGE v. AMAX, Inc., 909 F2d 1577 (9th Cir 1990). This was one of several proceedings against AMAX concerning PGE’s long-term coal supply agreement for PGE's Boardman electric generating plant. As a result of these proceedings, PGE was able to resume operating the Boardman plant;
-
John D. Graham v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, et al. and William J. Graham v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, et al. Defended Deloitte & Touche LLP in a negligent misrepresentation and Blue Sky case;
-
INA v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, et al. Defended Deloitte & Touche LLP in a subrogation claim brought by Tektronix's insurer;
-
BPA v. WPPSS, 956 F2d 1497 (9th Cir 1992). Represented PGE in the cost sharing and several other litigated aspects of the WPPSS debacle;
-
Henderson v. Lee. Obtained a $3 million jury verdict in this case involving fraud in the sale of a business;
-
Harold A. Miller, et al. V. United States, 620 F2d 812 (223 Ct Cl 352, 1980). Obtained an approximately $17 million judgment after a four-week trial in the Court of Claims;
-
United States of America v. United States National Bank of Oregon as Trustee for the Nonwithdrawing Members of the Klamath Indian Tribe. Obtained a judgment for $130,540,000 in this case involving the condemnation of the Klamath Indian Forest;
-
County of Josephine, et al. v. James G. Watt, et al., 539 F Supp 696 (ND CA 1982). Represented timber companies, counties and citizens groups who opposed the inclusion of Five Rivers in northern California in the Wild and Scenic Rivers System. We obtained a temporary restraining order against opposition by the government and numerous environmental groups;
-
Oregon Trail Electric Consumer Cooperative, Inc. v. Catalyst Energy, et al. Represented Oregon Trail Electric Consumers Cooperative, Inc. in a PURPA contract dispute. The case settled to the satisfaction of our client; and
-
Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Cases I and II and The People of the State of California v. Portland General Electric Company, et al. Defended a utility in a variety of litigation arising out of the California energy crisis.